The third Global AI Summit, organised by the Saudi Data and AI Authority (SDAIA), will be held in Riyadh from September 10 to 12. This is reported by Saudi Press Agency (SPA).
The main theme of the summit is human-AI interaction. It will discuss how AI can help humans, influence decision-making, and improve lives.
The summit will look at how AI can be used in various fields such as healthcare, finance, and education, how AI can help in decision-making and data analysis, and how it can influence social life and culture.
The summit will provide a platform to exchange ideas, learn about new developments in AI, and discuss the future of human-AI interaction.
The source claims that it also emphasises Saudi Arabia’s ambition to become a leader in AI and is in line with Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 goals for advanced technology.
The wreck of the Titanic is showing clear signs of decay on the sea floor at its resting place miles below the surface. What will its final fate be?
The RMS Titanic has spent more than 112 years in the crushing, total darkness of the deep ocean. When it sank on a cold, moonless night in April 1912, the 883ft (269m) long vessel broke apart, sending a rain of debris cascading down nearly 12,500ft (3.8km) to the silty ocean floor. The ship took more than 1,500 passengers and crew with it to their deaths.
Apart from the occasional visit from deep-sea submersibles and salvage missions bringing small artefacts to the surface, the wreckage has remained undisturbed as it has undergone the slow, steady process of decay.
Images from a recent expedition to the Titanic's wreck nearly 400 miles (640km) south-east of the Newfoundland coast have revealed the effects of this deterioration. Images of the Titanic's bow, with its distinctive railings, looming out of the darkness have become iconic since the discovery of the wreck in 1985. But in 2022, scans of the wreck showed the railing was starting to buckle and in the most recent visit to the wreck in 2024, a significant section has fallen now away. (Read more about the images captured during the latest expedition in this report by Rebecca Morelle and Alison Francis.)
It is a very visual indication of how the extreme environment in the ocean depths is breaking apart what remains of the world's most famous ship. The pressure of the ocean above it, water currents on the sea floor and iron-eating bacteria are causing the structure to collapse. And as it does so, the vessel is having a surprising impact on the ocean habitat around it.Under pressure
As it sank, the Titanic split into two main sections – the bow and the stern, which came to rest nearly 2,000ft (600m) apart on the sea floor. The stern section sunk directly to the bottom, while the bow sank more gradually.
Stretching more than 1.3 miles (2km) from behind the stern to the beyond the bow is a scattering of belongings, fittings, fixtures, coal and ship parts that fell away as the Titanic sank. Most of the debris is found clustered around the stern section, which is a twisted tangle of steel, while the bow has remained largely intact. This is because when the vessel hit the iceberg, the impact tore apart a riveted section of the hull, allowing an estimated 43,000 tonnes of water to flood into the bow. When the stern section broke away, it still had compartments filled with air. As it spun towards the sea floor, the rapidly increasing water pressure caused the structure around these air pockets to implode, scattering metal, statues, champagne bottles and passengers' possessions as it did so.
On the sea bed, the Titanic endures water pressures of around 40MPa, which are 390 times greater than those on the surface. But as there are no air pockets left in the vessel, further catastrophic implosions are unlikely.
Instead, the weight of the vast ship itself is now playing a part in its demise. As the 52,000 tonnes of steel settle into the ocean floor, it is creating twisting force across the steel hull that is pulling the ship apart. Large cracks and fissures have been seen appearing in the steel plates of the hull by successive submersible missions, and the decking areas have been collapsing inwards."The iconic silhouette of the wreck will gradually change year by year – and not in its favour," says Gerhard Seiffert, a deep-water marine archaeologist who in 2022 led an expedition to capture high-resolution scans of Titanic wreckage with the deep sea mapping company Magellan. "The drop of the railing segment, which was still in place in 2022 when I was on the wreck with Magellan, or the collapse of the ceiling in the captain's bathroom years before may serve as examples," he says.
Corrosion, Seiffert says, is gradually weakening the structure of the ship as steel plates, beams and other load-bearing elements become thinner.
Devoured by bacteria
Like any iron or steel structure, the Titanic is rusting. But under 2.4 miles (3.8km) of seawater, the processes involved are different from those on land where oxygen and water trigger a chemical reaction to produce iron oxide. On the Titanic, much of the corrosion is being caused instead by bacteria.
The wreck is covered in a biofilm – a living blanket of bacteria, marine fungi and other microbes – which is feeding on the wreck itself. Initially the organic materials such as upholstery, pillows, towels and furniture provided a rich supply of nutrients for microbes drifting past in the ocean depths, causing them to settle.Over time, other more extreme microbes have also taken hold, perhaps seeded from beneath the sea floor when the wreck ploughed into it, or drifting from distant hydrothermal vents on the mid-Atlantic ridge.
More like this:
• Rarely seen Titanic artefacts kept in secret warehouse
• Why the waters around the Titanic are still treacherous
• Scans of Titanic reveal wreck as never seen before
Assorted bacteria that oxidise the iron in the ship, along with others that produce acid, are eating into the metal surfaces. Other microbes that consume the rust these others produce have also been found flourishing on the wreck.
Visitors to the wreck have noticed it has become covered in "rusticles" – icicle-like formations hanging off the structure formed of oxidised metal. Living within these formations is a collection of collaborating and competing micro-organisms. When scientists broke off one of these rusticles in 1991 during the Akademic Mstislav Keldysh expedition to the wreckage, they were able to return it to the surface in a sealed container.Among the microbes the researchers discovered was a species of bacteria that was entirely new to science when it was discovered on the wreck. Halomonas titanicae, as the bacteria was later named, carries genes that allow it to break down iron.
Sulphur-reducing bacteria have also infiltrated areas that are devoid of oxygen, such as microscopic crevices created as the structure buckles. These produce sulphur, which is converted to sulfuric acid in seawater and then corrodes the metal of the ship, causing it to release its iron for other microbes to consume.
Scientists believe that that the stern of the ship accumulated a greater level of damage as the ship fell, causing it to deteriorate 40 years faster than the bow section.
"This is why the Titanic's bow is decaying from the aft end more, where the ship broke apart, and why the decay is progressing forward towards the prow or front region, which is relatively more intact," explains Anthony El-Khouri, a microbiologist at the Eastern Florida State College who has been working with the Canadian film director and deep-ocean explorer James Cameron to understand how microbes are contributing the decay of the Titanic.
"The stern section appears to be melting into the seafloor since it is globally damaged, except the reciprocating engines, fantail, rudder, and propellors, which are more intact and resilient, therefore remaining somewhat recognisable," says El-Khouri.Titanic's wreck behaves essentially like a great iron oasis on the seafloor – Anthony El-Khouri
One strange feature discovered inside the Titanic's Turkish Baths by Cameron during his 2005 expedition to the wreck are the formation of elaborate but delicate tendrils of rust that the director named "rustflowers". Using a remotely operated vehicle, he discovered the teak and mahogany woodwork in the spa had been unusually preserved because the baths were deep inside the ship and so were devoid of oxygen. This anoxic environment prevented bacteria and other microbes that might degrade the wood from living there.
But instead, the baths were covered in strange, branching growths of rust rising up to 1.5m (5ft) from the floor of the baths. Curiously, these "rustflowers" seemed to point in the same direction – following geomagnetic lines. El-Khouri, Cameron and their colleagues have found clues that suggest they are formed by colonies of rust-producing bacteria and "magnetotactic" bacteria living on the wreck. These unusual microbes contain nanocrystals of iron that allow them to align with magnetic fields. As these colonies of bacteria munch through the Titanic's steel, they leave behind trails of rust that "bloom" vertically along the Earth's magnetic field lines, says El-Khouri.
An enormous iron meal
The vast amount of iron-rich metal that the Titanic introduced to the sea floor has created an unusual ecosystem around it. As it corrodes, iron particles dissolve into the surrounding water, enriching it with a scarce, but vital nutrient in the deep ocean.
"Although iron is the most common element on Earth overall, solubilised iron is the scarcest nutrient in the ocean, which limits the success of any marine ecosystem," says El-Khouri. Volcanic hydrothermal vents are often a key source of iron in the deep ocean, and can help to support a wide variety of life, where bacteria play an important role in making the iron available to other creatures nearby."Titanic's wreck behaves essentially like a great iron oasis on the seafloor, a 46,000-tonne extrusion of iron in the shape of a former luxury liner," says El-Khouri. "This oasis provides a coveted nutrient, facilitating a vibrant deep ocean reef inhabited by starfish, anemones, glass sponges, benthic corals and sea cucumbers. And of course, iron bacterial colonies," he says.
El-Khouri and his colleagues found that these iron-related bacteria are not only eating the iron on the Titanic, but "are also capable of breathing it" instead of oxygen. "It's a remarkable ecosystem far removed from the Sun, with implications on the sort of extremophiles we might discover inside Europa and other cosmic oceans beyond Earth someday," he says. (Read more about why Nasa is exploring the deepest oceans on Earth.)
The Titanic's iron is also having an effect on the sea floor too. Rust flows are spreading out from the wreck at a rate of around 4in (10cm) per year and extend up to 6in (15cm) into the sediment. These flows of iron are particularly concentrated around the hull of the stern.
In total, scientists estimate that the Titanic is losing around 0.13 to 0.2 tonnes of iron from its rusticle formations every day. This has led some to estimate that the iron in the ships bow could totally dissolve in 280-420 years.Currents on the sea floor
But other factors could speed up the destruction of the wreck. Just as strong surface currents can carry boats and swimmers off course, the deep ocean is also scoured by underwater currents. Although not as powerful as those on the surface, deep ocean currents involve large amounts of water. They can be driven by winds at the surface affecting the water column below, deep water tides or differences in the water density caused by temperature and salinity, known as thermohaline currents. Rare events known as benthic storms – which are usually related to eddies on the surface – can also cause powerful, sporadic currents that can sweep away material on the seabed.
Research on the sediment patterns on the seabed around the Titanic, along with the movement of squid around the wreck, have provided insights into how the vessel is being buffeted by undersea currents.
Part of the Titanic wreck is known to lie close to a section of seabed affected by a stream of cold, southward-flowing water known as the Western Boundary Undercurrent. The flow of this "bottom current" creates migrating dunes, ripples and ribbon-shaped patterns in the sediment and mud. Most of the formations they have observed on the seabed are associated with relatively weak to moderate currents.
Sand ripples along the eastern edge of the Titanic debris field also indicate there is a westerly bottom-flowing current, while within the main wreckage site, scientists say the currents trend from north-west to south-west, perhaps due to the larger pieces of the wreck altering their direction.
Around to the south of the bow section, the currents seem particularly changeable, ranging from north-east to north-west to south-west.Although none of these currents are considered to be particularly strong, they can still create disturbances that will cause the wreck to break apart as it weakens.
"Even currents generated by submersibles can cause weak structures to collapse," says Seiffert. "Although they may [also] remove some of the rusticles, which will delay corrosion at such areas," he says.
There is also a chance that the winnowing of these currents will eventually bury the Titanic wreckage in sediment before it has a chance to disintegrate completely.
But before then some of the more iconic sections of the wreck could disappear, much like the recent collapse of the instantly recognisable bow rail, which Cameron had his characters Jack and Rose stand behind in a famous scene in his 1997 film about the Titanic."I estimate that the more iconic regions of the wreck, such as its superstructure – Grand Staircase foyer, Marconi Room, Officer's Quarters – will disappear around the year 2100, making submersible landings aboard Titanic more challenging," says El-Khouri. "Thinner steel vanishes early, such as railings and deck houses on the boat deck. But even at this rate of decay, the wreck will require several centuries to fully disappear."
Large pieces of steel buried in the sediment, and so protected from the worst ravages of the metal-munching microbes could last longer – perhaps several hundred years, estimates El-Khouri.
But the ultimate fate awaiting the world's most famous shipwreck? An iron oxide smudge on the sea floor, studded with tiles, toilets and brass fittings.
"Porcelain objects, such as the vibrant tiles in the Turkish Baths, which are composed of fired silica, will endure almost forever," says El-Khouri.
It will be a rather humble monument to one of the most tragic examples of hubris and human fallibility. But then, perhaps, it's also a poignantly quiet end to a vessel that has been blighted with so much heartache.
The European Union's naval mission in the Red Sea says private companies have called off attempts to salvage a burning oil tanker because the situation is unsafe.
The Greek-owned and flagged MV Sounion, carrying about a million barrels of crude, was abandoned by its crew after it was hit by projectiles fired by Yemen’s Houthi movement on 21 August. Fighters later detonated explosives onboard, sparking several fires.
Last Wednesday, the Houthis said they had agreed to allow the tanker to be towed away to avert an unprecedented environmental disaster.
The EU mission, which was providing security to the tugs involved in the salvage operation, said “alternative solutions" were being explored.On Monday, the mission reported that fires continued to burn on the tanker’s main deck. “The vessel remains anchored without drifting, and there are no visible signs of an oil spill,” it said.
The United States has warned that a spill from the Sounion could be almost four times as large as the Exxon Valdez disaster in 1989. That incident saw 2,100km (1,300 miles) of coastline contaminated after a tanker ran aground off Alaska.
The Iran-backed Houthis have repeatedly targeted commercial shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden since November.
They say they are acting in support of the Palestinians in the war between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip. They have claimed - often falsely - that they are targeting ships only linked to Israel, the US or the UK.
They have not been deterred by the deployment of Western warships to protect merchant vessels or by US and British air strikes on territory they control in north-western Yemen. Israel also bombed Hudaydah’s port in July in retaliation for a deadly drone strike on Tel Aviv.The Houthis attacked the Sounion two weeks ago with gunfire from small boats, before hitting it with three unidentified projectiles, the UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) agency said at the time. Its 25 crew members were rescued by a European warship.
The tanker was later attacked again, with footage released by the group last Thursday showing Houthi fighters boarding the ship and detonating at least six bombs simultaneously.
The leader of the Houthis called the attack “brave and bold” in a recent address.
The Houthis have continued to attack oil tankers in the Red Sea in recent days.
On Monday, the US military’s Central Command said the Panama-owned and flagged MV Blue Lagoon I and the Saudi-owned and flagged MV Amjad were hit by two ballistic missiles and a one-way attack drone.
The Amjad is carrying approximately two million barrels of oil – almost twice the amount on the Sounion.
“These reckless acts of terrorism by the Houthis continue to destabilize regional and global commerce, as well as put the lives of civilian mariners and maritime ecosystems at risk,” Central Command said.
Telegram has apologised to South Korean authorities for its handling of deepfake pornographic material shared via its messaging app, amid a digital sex crime epidemic in the country.
It comes days after South Korean police said they had launched an investigation into Telegram, accusing it of "abetting" the distribution of such images.
In recent weeks, a large number of Telegram chatrooms - many of them run by teenagers - were found to have been creating sexually explicit "deepfakes" using doctored photographs of young women.
Authorities say Telegram has since removed such videos from its platform.In a statement to South Korea's Communications Standards Commission (KCSC), Telegram said the situation was "unfortunate", adding that it "apologised if there had been an element of misunderstanding".
It also confirmed that it had taken down 25 such videos as requested by KCSC.
In its latest statement to KCSC, Telegram also proposed an email address dedicated to future communication with the regulator.
KCSC described the company's approach as "very forward-looking" and said Telegram has "acknowledged the seriousness" of the situation.
Deepfakes are generated using artificial intelligence, and often combine the face of a real person with a fake body.
The recent deepfake crisis has been met with outrage in South Korea, after journalists discovered police were investigating deepfake porn rings at two of the country's major universities.
It later emerged that police received 118 reports of such videos in the last five days. Seven suspects, six of whom are teenagers, have been questioned by the police in the past week.
The chat groups were linked to individual schools and universities across the country. Many of their victims were students and teachers known to the perpetrators.
In South Korea, those found guilty of creating sexually explicit deepfakes can be jailed for up to five years and fined up to 50 million won ($37,500; £28,300).
These discoveries in South Korea follow the arrest of the Russian-born founder of Telegram, Pavel Durov, in France, on allegations that child pornography, drug trafficking and fraud were taking place on the messaging app.
Mr Durov has since been charged.
Last Tuesday, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol had instructed authorities to "thoroughly investigate and address these digital sex crimes to eradicate them".
Women's rights activists have accused South Korean authorities of allowing sexual abuse to take place on Telegram.
In 2019, it was discovered that a sex ring had used the app to blackmail dozens of women and children to film pornographic content. The ring leader Cho Ju-bin, who was then 20, was sentenced to 42 years in jail.
A mother and her three daughters were among seven people killed in Ukraine's western city of Lviv, during a fresh wave of Russian attacks. A baby and another girl were also killed, officials said.
Lviv Mayor Andriy Sadovy said Russia had attacked with drones and hypersonic missiles early on Wednesday.
The attack came as Ukraine reeled from Russia's deadliest single bombardment this year - a strike on a military institute in the central city of Poltava that left 53 people dead.
Explosions were also heard on Wednesday over the capital Kyiv as air defences targeted Russian missiles. Five people were wounded in Kryvyy Rih when a hotel was hit and nearby blocks of damaged.The attack on Lviv in the far west of Ukraine came as all of Ukraine was under air raid alert. Witnesses said the city was targeted at about 05:40 (02:40 GMT).
Russia's defence ministry said it had fired Kinzhal hypersonic weapons at Ukrainian defence industry facilities in Lviv and that all designated targets had been hit.
However, Mr Sadovy said Russia's attack had damaged more than 50 buildings in the historic heart of Lviv, including homes, schools and clinics.
He posted a picture on social media of a local family, saying that only the father had survived. His wife, Yevgenia, and their three daughters - Darina, Emilia and 21-year-old Yaryna - all died in their own home, he said.The Ukrainian air force said Russia had fired 13 missiles and 29 attack drones and that seven cruise missiles and 22 drones were shot down.
Mr Sadovy said some buildings were struck near the railway station and Lviv regional administration head Maksym Kozytskyi said residential buildings had been damaged in the attack.
Lviv has largely been spared the worst of the fighting over the two and a half years of war, but last week, Russian strikes targeted its energy infrastructure causing outages, according to officials.
President Volodymyr Zelensky renewed his calls for Ukraine's Western allies to all their long-range weapons to be fired further into Russia.
In Poltava, rescue workers continued to search through the rubble of the military communications institute for survivors of the attack.
Mykyta Petrov, a 26-year-old cadet who only started there two weeks ago, said two missiles hit shortly after 09:00 (06:00 GMT) on Tuesday, the second detonating just three seconds after the first.
“I ran outside, there was smoke and dust everywhere…lots of people were outside having a cigarette, and many were killed."
The cadet said there was “too much blood, too many dead bodies", and what he had seen had affected him psychologically.
An air raid siren had gone off two minutes earlier, but had not given people enough time to reach bomb shelters."You just imagine you're on the sixth floor of some building and you need to run away downstairs. Is it realistic that you can do this in two minutes?" Ukrainian MP Oleksiy Goncharenko told the BBC.
President Volodymyr Zelensky promised that what he called "Russian scum" would pay for the attack, and repeated calls for more air defences so Ukraine could protect itself by carrying out its own long-range missile attacks.
In a statement confirming the deaths of military personnel, Ukraine's land forces said an investigation was under way to establish whether enough was done to protect those in the facility the missile hit.Poltava regional governor Philip Pronin called the attack a "cunning and cynical Russian strike," and later said 15 people were still thought to be trapped under the rubble.
Mr Zelensky ws due to meet the Irish premier on Wednesday as Ireland prepares to announce new funding for Ukraine's war effort.
The Taoiseach will also announce €43m (£36 million) in aid to Ukraine.
The Irish Government said the package will provide essential humanitarian assistance, support rehabilitation and eventual reconstruction, and contribute to Ukraine's longer-term goals.
The Grenfell Tower fire that killed 72 people in 2017 was the result of a chain of failures by governments, "dishonest" companies and a lack of strategy by the fire service, the final report of the six-year public inquiry has concluded.
The damning report sets out a "path to disaster" at Grenfell stretching back to the early 1990s over how fire safety in high rise buildings has been managed and regulated.
The coalition and Conservative governments “ignored, delayed or disregarded” concerns about the safety of industry practices, the inquiry said.
One manufacturer of cladding products “deliberately concealed” the fire risks they posed, the report added.Among the recommendations laid out in the 1,700-page report are the introduction of a single construction regulator, a College of Fire and Rescue to improve the training of firefighters and changes to the way materials are tested for fire safety.
The report's publication comes more than seven years after the fire started in a fridge on the fourth floor of the west London tower block, spreading through the cladding before racing up the sides of the building.
Many residents were trapped on higher floors as it spread, and the inquiry found all the victims were dead or unconscious by the time the flames reached them due to "inhalation of asphyxiant gases", primarily carbon monoxide.
The cladding was made of highly flammable polyethylene which was added to the sides of Grenfell Tower in a disastrous refurbishment in 2016.
The inquiry found fault and incompetence among almost every company involved in the refurbishment.
Among the key findings of the report were:
"Systematic dishonesty" by the manufacturers of cladding and insulation
US firm Arconic, manufacturer of the Reynobond 55 cladding which experts at the inquiry said was "by far the largest contributor" to the fire, deliberately concealed the true extent of the danger of using its product
Manufacturers made "false and misleading claims" over the safety and suitability of insulation to the company which installed it on Grenfell
Failures in London Fire Brigade's training and a lack of a strategy to evacuate the building
Successive governments missed opportunities to act
The local council and the Tenant Management Organisation had a "persistent indifference to fire safety, particularly the safety of vulnerable people"
How building safety is managed in England and Wales is “seriously defective”
Speaking after the report was published, the inquiry chair Sir Martin Moore-Bick read the names of the 72 people who died at Grenfell.
Police and prosecutors have said that investigators will need until the end of 2025 to complete their inquiry, with final decisions on potential criminal charges by the end of 2026.
“Unscrupulous” manufacturers
The inquiry examined the roles of three companies which made cladding and insulation used in the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower.
In a key passage it concluded:
“One very significant reason why Grenfell Tower came to be clad in combustible materials was systematic dishonesty on the part of those who made and sold the rainscreen cladding… and insulation."
They engaged in “deliberate and sustained strategies to manipulate the testing processes, misrepresent data and mislead the market,” the report found.
Arconic produced panels of Reynobond PE cladding, formed from metal sheets with a plastic layer. This was “extremely dangerous” when folded into box shapes, a practice widely used in the cladding industry, the inquiry concluded.
The cladding was “by far the largest contributor” to the Grenfell fire, according to new research by two inquiry experts.
However from 2005 until after the Grenfell Tower fire, Arconic “deliberately concealed from the market the true extent of the danger of using Reynobond 55 PE in cassette form, particularly on high rise buildings”. It allowed customers to continue buying the product.
Arconic commissioned fire tests which revealed very poor ratings for cladding installed as folded cassettes but concealed these from the BBA, a British private certification company which attempted to keep the construction industry up to date about safety risks.
This “caused BBA to make statements that Arconic knew were ‘false and misleading'”, the report said.
Among the UK customers which were misled, was Harley Facades, the company which installed the Grenfell cladding.
The inquiry also found fault with both Celotex and Kingspan, which both made insulation, also part of a cladding system.
Celotex made “false and misleading claims” and presented its product to Harley Facades as being safe and suitable for Grenfell although "it knew that was not the case”.
It used magnesium oxide boards, which do not burn, during testing and did not reveal this in marketing literature.
Kingspan, which had led the way in gaining market share in the insulation industry by selling its product for tall buildings “misled the market” by not revealing the limitations of its product, used on a small section of Grenfell Tower.
The refurbishment of Grenfell Tower was overseen by the Tenant Management Organisation which ran social housing for the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea.
The relationship between the TMO and its own residents was characterised by “distrust, dislike, personal antagonism and anger”. Allowing the relationship to deteriorate was a “serious failure on its part to observe its basic responsibilities”, the inquiry said.
Both organisations were found to have “persistent indifference to fire safety, particularly the safety of vulnerable people".
The inquiry found that a 2011 project to replace fire doors at Grenfell left the building with doors which did not meet the correct standard because the TMO failed to specify the correct one when ordering them.
Fire doors are designed to withstand flames and smoke for thirty minutes to improve residents’ chance of rescue.
In assessing the role of the architects Studio E, project manager Rydon and cladding contractor Harley Facades the report most often described them as incompetent.
Studio E failed to recognise the cladding and insulation were combustible and “bears a very significant degree of responsibility for the disaster”, in the words of the inquiry report.
Harley Facades “bears significant responsibility. It did not concern itself with fire safety at any stage”.
Rydon, also bears “considerable responsibility” as project manager which “saw its role as the conductor of a large and varied orchestra”.
But “there was a failure to establish clearly who was responsible for what, including who was responsible for ensuring the designs were compliant with statutory requirements. That eventually resulted in the unedifying 'merry go round of buck passing'".
Government failures
According to the report, there were “many opportunities for the government to identify the risks posed by the use of combustible cladding panels and insulation... and to take action”.
Experts warned of the risk of cladding fires in 1992, the year after a fire at the 11-storey Knowsley Heights tower on Merseyside and again in 1999 after a fire at Garnock Court in Scotland, after which MPs said only non-combustible cladding should be used on tall buildings.
But combustible cladding was not banned because it met a British standard known as “Class Zero”. The MPs said this should have been scrapped.
“It could and should have been removed years earlier,” the inquiry found.
In 2001 a series of large-scale fire tests revealed “striking results” in which cladding “burned violently”, but the rules still weren’t tightened by the government and the results of the tests were kept confidential.
“We do not understand the failure to act in relation to a matter of such importance,” the inquiry panel said.
A fatal fire at Lakanal House in South London in 2009 prompted a coroner to order a review of building regulations, but this was “not treated with any sense of urgency.”
When the coalition government took power in 2010 ministers were told to cut red tape.
The inquiry found this “dominated the department’s thinking to such an extent that even matters affecting the safety of life were ignored, delayed or disregarded”.
The pressure to cut red tape was “so strong... civil servants felt the need to put it at the forefront of every decision".
The inquiry panel described the housing ministry as “poorly run”, with fire safety placed in the hands of a single “relatively junior” official.
The government has previously apologised at the inquiry saying it “deeply regrets past failures in relation to the oversight of the system that regulated safety in the construction and refurbishment of high rise buildings".
The government’s expert adviser, the Building Research Establishment was privatised in 1997 becoming BRE, a private company.
It was strongly criticised by the government for its “unprofessional conduct, inadequate practices, a lack of effective oversight, poor reports and a lack of scientific rigour".
These exposed it to “unscrupulous product manufacturers".
Fire service shortcomings
While individual firefighters trekked repeatedly up the smoke-filled staircase to find trapped residents, the London Fire Brigade had failed to prepare them for what they faced.
The Lakanal fire in 2009, in which six people died, “should have alerted the LFB to the shortcomings of its ability to fight fires in high rise buildings”, the inquiry found.
There was an “unfounded assumption the building regulations were sufficient to ensure external wall fires in other countries would not occur in this country”.
“No-one appears to have thought that firefighters needed to be trained to recognise and deal with the consequences.”
Senior officers were complacent and lacked the management skills to recognise the problems or the will to correct them.
There was a failure to share knowledge about cladding fires, a failure to plan for a large number of 999 calls, or train staff in what to tell trapped residents.
Recommendations made by the inquiry
The inquiry has concluded that the way building safety is managed in England and Wales is “seriously defective”, “complex and fragmented”.
It has recommended the introduction of a single construction regulator, and one secretary of state to oversee the issue.
The guidance the industry follows to ensure fire safety should be revised, the inquiry says.
There is also a recommendation to make it a legal requirement that a fire safety strategy is submitted with any application for permission from building control inspectors to construct or refurbish a “higher risk building”.
Other recommendations cover the way materials and designs are tested for fire safety, and the need to make public the results.
Currently building inspectors who sign off work as safe can be employed by councils or work as private “approved inspectors” who can compete for work. The inquiry recommends setting up an independent panel which would consider whether this is in the public interest. The panel could decide to set up a national authority for building control, which would be a major change to the system for ensuring construction standards.
Finding major issues with standards in the fire service, the inquiry recommends setting up a College of Fire and Rescue to improve the training of firefighters and incident commanders.
There are a series of recommendations for the London Fire Brigade management of major incidents and a demand for the service to be reviewed by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary, Fire and Rescue Services.
The inquiry also calls for improvements to the way local authorities, the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea in particular, responds to major emergencies.
A woman who developed a rare type of cancer linked to her breast implants has warned that others with similar implants could be "walking around like timebombs".
Susan Axelby, 68, was recently paid £57,000 by Allergan Limited after she fell ill with breast-implant associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL).
It is thought to be one of the first payouts of this kind linked to Allergan breast implants in the UK.
She had her breasts removed to avoid the risk of inherited breast cancer - but went on to develop cancer after the implants.
Regulators have received at least 106 reports of BIA-ALCL relating to surgery in the UK, involving six manufacturers.Rare risk
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is currently collecting data on women who are affected.
In her first broadcast interview, Susan told BBC Radio 4's Woman's Hour programme about the ordeal - and while her case is very rare, she has a warning for others.
"I'm thinking, not so much me - I'm nearly 70 - but there's young girls, because they wanted breast augmentation, and they're walking around like timebombs," she said.
"They've no idea what's in their body now - and if it's happened to me and a few other people, you know, they can be walking around like that."
Susan had the implants in Sheffield, where she lives, after her own breasts were removed to protect her against an inherited cancer risk.
A few years later, she noticed some swelling in one of her new breasts, which felt hot to the touch.
'Swelled up'
"I went back to the hospital and they drained 500 millilitres of fluid out of it," Susan said.
"Then I went back home and it swelled up again.
"I went back again and they drained the same amount off - within a month, that was."
Susan was referred to a surgeon, who discovered she had BIA-ALCL - a cancer of the immune system, not a type of breast cancer, that can develop in the scar tissue around breast implants.
"I didn't believe it," she said.
"I was in denial because I'd had my breasts off to stop me getting cancer and now I've got cancer.
"I thought, 'How can that be?'"
The surgeon then told Susan the implant had to be removed.
"He said, 'we're going to have to take it out and take the breasts off again'," she said.
"And they said I could never, ever have another implant.
"The only way around it is to take stuff from another part of my body and rebuild it.
"I just said to him, 'I can't go through that again'."'I have bad days'
Susan now has no implants, breast tissue or nipples.
"There's actually nothing," she said.
"There's just a straight line all the way across the top of my body."
It has affected her confidence and wellbeing.
"I don't like anyone to see me without any clothes on and that does quite include my husband, although he's not bothered at all.
"I have bad days.
"I still get problems with my anxiety and my depression, so it's never gone away."
Susan had sued Allergan, she said, not just for her own sake but for others too.
The claim was settled and Allergan, a US pharmaceutical company, paid Susan the £57,000 in October 2023, with no admission of liability.
Scientists say BIA-ALCL could be a reaction to the implant's textured surface or a bacterial infection.
As of December 2023, the estimated incidence of BIA-ALCL, based on confirmed cases requiring surgery in the UK, is one per 14,200 implants sold.
Other affected people in the UK are coming together to take legal action.
And another group is seeking compensation from Allergan on behalf of 60,000 women from the Netherlands.
In 2019, Allergan issued a voluntary global recall of Biocell textured breast implants and tissue expanders and no longer manufactures these types of implants.
The MHRA says there is no need for people with breast implants but no signs or symptoms of BIA-ALCL, to have them removed or checked.
But anyone with unusual signs or symptoms, such as swelling around their breast implant, should see a doctor.
Source:BBC
The family of a British aid worker killed in Gaza in April has urged the government to launch an independent legal inquiry into his death.
James Kirby was one of three Britons killed in Israeli drone strikes on an aid convoy run by the World Central Kitchen (WCK) charity.
Ahead of a memorial service for Mr Kirby at Bristol Cathedral on Wednesday, the family also criticised the government for not being in touch since his death and expressed their “surprise” at not receiving any contact or condolence from Israel’s ambassador to the UK or any Israeli official since the attack.
In a statement to the BBC, a spokesperson for Israel's embassy in London called the incident "a tragic mistake" and expressed their "deepest sorrow" to James's family, adding that the IDF dismissed two people following an investigation into the incident.Speaking on behalf of the family, James’s cousin, Louise Kirby, said: “There must be a proper, independent inquiry into this attack on innocent aid workers, and for the evidence to be assessed, if appropriate, in a relevant court of law.
“However, unfortunately, families have had no contact from the UK Government since James and his colleagues’ deaths, nor have we received any information as to whether a credible, independent investigation is taking place; or of the results of any investigation if it has taken place.”
She added: “I very much hope the prime minister will take our concerns seriously and instigate an appropriate, independent or legal inquiry – not only so we can have transparency and accountability, but so that other British citizens and their families know that their government will act for them, if a foreign state unlawfully kills their loved ones.”
James Kirby, 47, a former serviceman, was one of seven killed in the air strikes on an aid convoy run by WCK on 1 April.
Two other Britons – John Chapman, 57, and James Henderson, 33 – were also killed. They were providing security for the convoy moving food to a warehouse in Gaza.
The IDF has said a drone operator mistakenly targeted the convoy after thinking it had been taken over by Hamas gunmen.
Three missiles were fired in three locations over five minutes. The first missile hit a car and some passengers escaped to another vehicle. That was then hit by a second missile. Some survivors tried to flee in a third car which was also struck. Everyone in the convoy was killed.
After an internal investigation, the IDF sacked two officers and formally reprimanded two senior commanders.
The evidence from the investigation was passed to the military advocate general - the Israeli army's top legal authority - to determine if there had been any criminal conduct.
A spokesperson for Israel’s embassy in London said: "This incident was a tragic mistake and we express our deepest sorrow to James Kirby’s family, the other bereaved families, including those of John Chapman and James Henderson, and the entire World Central Kitchen team, who were doing such vital work in extremely challenging circumstances.
"As outlined by the IDF’s Fact-Finding and Assessment Mechanism (FFAM) in the in-depth independent investigation, conducted following the incident, a serious failure was made due to a mistaken identification as well as errors in decision-making.
"In light of this, a brigade fire support commander and brigade chief of staff were dismissed. Once again, we express our deepest condolences and sorrow to the families of the bereaved and the WCK team.”
In the wake of the attack, the then-Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, called for a “thorough and transparent independent investigation” into what had happened.
In the statement, Louise Kirby thanked friends and supporters – including WCK – for their support. She said the family had been touched to receive personal letters of condolence from the King and Queen and the former Foreign Secretary, Lord Cameron.
But she said “the murder” of James and his fellow aid workers was “a diabolical tragedy” and the family were “still struggling to find answers and accountability for what happened”.
She said that, given Israel had said the strikes were an accident, the family had been surprised not to have had any contact or message of condolence from Israel’s ambassador to the UK, nor from any Israeli official.
"Any family of a loved one who has been killed needs closure. We need to understand how this disaster could have happened," she said.
"But this is not just about us. This is about how Britain looks after its own citizens and their families, when a British citizen has been unlawfully killed by another state.”Ms Kirby added: “We appreciate the compassion and respect we have been shown, but we must also have transparency and accountability. How did this happen? Who is responsible? What accountability did they face?
"Just saying ‘sorry it was an accident’ is not enough. We need to know, and we need to know there has been accountability at all levels, so it never happens again.”
A government spokesman said the bereaved families were being supported by police liaison support officers who were “regular contact” with the Foreign Office.
“The death of James and his fellow aid workers was horrific and our thoughts remain with their families,” the spokesperson said.
“Attacks on aid workers are never justified and we remain fully committed to their protection as they support some of the most vulnerable people in the world.”
“There must be an immediate ceasefire to protect civilians and aid workers, secure the release of all hostages and ensure much more aid gets into Gaza. Israel must guarantee the protection of aid workers and ensure a tragedy like this cannot happen again.”
The spokesperson did not address the families’ demand for an independent inquiry.
Israel launched its military campaign in Gaza in response to Hamas's unprecedented attack on southern Israel on 7 October during which about 1,200 were killed and 251 were taken hostage.
More than 40,000 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry.